Of Course Correction

Not to pun on the rock.
But I have been fishing** in the Salish Sea.
Knot that Strait [!]*

* speaking of plot lines, the bold and the but if ul, inserted last.
i.e. The Atlantic(Strait) was not read at the time of the line, and the Washington Post(But) not even yet.
**Roger that.

[Breaking***: AM - PC RC ! ]
***(9-20-13) Not certain this is the piece. But 2014 is the point in the House.

Cultural Threads are Fine.

Something about string theory? 
Or original^ intent?
The prism of ideology?**

O W
Oh Wow*.

^ the ad/on Colbert
*something about anamolic/anomalic,
probably Pythagorian to us all. knot [!]
Re / De!
BO/OB?
Barrack Obama/ Olive Branch
Sandel/Huntington

** ideology (and mess'n wit' the word)
[Punch Line ? ! Mmmm MOW, MOW ]
Still fishing 4 another root.(or source) by google ^^ [c-3].

^^  i. e. Re reeding 'n De-quilting!  I preemptively and post-humusly linkoln update.
[Manichean is knot but many key 'n is.]
[A sorting of some basic links, may further under standing ! ? or knot]
[Ruff!?] eph 'n ? !  The Cycle  You can't run and gum!   Medina ;-) ?   
Johnny Cash / There is "fuzzy math", there is "fuzzy English" and there is ge oh metrics.

Try Pod

Two legs of Obama's three leg stand are pragmatic and incremental. The third is comprehensive, not always comprehensible *. And the pinnacle of the Try Pod is co-operation.

* See Spinners or unspin.
[pre- and post-fishing, and deeper lines.]
[P's in a pod(trickle down) or P's in a tetrahedron.]

HAPPY FOURTH OF JULY

Went Fishing! Lots of Fireworks!

Tacky, tact, tack...

Who let the Dogfish* out?
Apology Cruise?

* not exactly [!]

Apology Cruise?  First, a Dogfish is a shark and I must admit to participating in their demise as a fisherman.  A billy-club or gaff hook is the tool of choice.  Second, Akin to fishing trips or the Romney Embassy gaff is Juan Coles hook to "Jumping the Shark".  Irony of Wrong Knees**, "legitimate rape" is almost long forgotten, what with the "empty chair" and the "Leder" Twain. 

** I am not implying Right or Wrong, only Diploma See.^

^ of Right and Wrong
S.E. Cupp
Evan Kohlmann

[9-20-12: or non-Prof-etiq et tu?  AM Clint 'n's Worlds?]

In order to read...

Sea 1st** Asterisk:

Bachman Perry Overdrive
Iowa Hallelujah Bachman (NPR)
Texas Perry Un-Miracle (Krugman)
LA Times Straw Poll
Graham Perry?
Perry

Jobs Obama Agenda (NYTimes)
Democrats Agenda (McClatchy)
Tables Turn on GOP
Gears Obama to Public
Failure Perry's Job Growth
Center for American Progress

NFRY
Hi Ate Us[!]

* War
not Rall
exactly Dad

Dream
CQ
Obama
Inspiration


** 1st @ asterisk
(pun on straights I was in)
[Speaking of fishing and spinners and red herrings over coffee.]

***

WOE / Wae

War on Executives:

Romney charges Obama with "real war upon women".

Hides behind women against women.

WOE to woe-men!

Or War Against Evidence:

I am not saying that the Republicans are waging a war on women or that Democrats are not saying it. I am saying there are two questions which I will not answer, who started the war and who started calling it a war? I am also saying that I have not found the evidence in the links attached here, and suggesting that there is a war no matter who calls it a war or who started calling it a war.

I have yet to find who started the claim that there is a war on women. I am not saying that I don't believe that Obama could have used the term*, I just haven't found it.**

* war on women, war against women, war for women...'s votes.

[Google of the Day? Is it an anomaly that Steve Benen on Rachel Maddow Blog is the second hit for the question. "When did..." re-framed as "Has President Obama said there is a war on women?" Third Frame: "Obama talks about war on women." Fourth fishing trip? No War on Women. WOW! ]

[OK, I have an un-Warren Ted side trip, and not a cheat sheet. But just to be clear**]

[Jumping in the Lakoff! But Republicans cannot win the VFW.(Victory for Women or Victory from Whining.) It is a victory for wordplay.]

< Speaking of victory for wordplay, Thom Hartmann takes on the West word Hoe[!] >

** added 4-13-12 (** that is) Haven't found the President using the term but Debbie Wasserman-Schultz is quoted using it without full context in the CSM.

** Follow up?

FOOTNOTES PAGE AUGUST 2013

Up Date: That's the ticket. 

8-2-13 The blank's the thing. A. Proxymoron?, # That is the ticket!, #?.(FP5) x. Killing Fields of Dreams, (y) Tea Party Down Grade, z. Congress- - to boldly go... ? 
8-2-13 1., 2. a., b., c., d(a), e.(We are at the table. ), f.(Update), g.House of Cards, h.  3. a. b.Killer Ad from Killer Group c.Take On The Hill! d. e.Post-Pyth F. G. h.I'm not saying... i. j. k. l. m. n. o. Just Say O! 4.MessAge 5.(Dime) a. Mmmm MOW, MOW, b.Tin Foil Herman, c. R.S.V.P.

8-4-13 VC, Vinyl Café, Vicious Cycle Virtuous Correction? Pun on VC or Victimizer Congress.
Perception Correction President(shall) Congress(shun)all?
8-5-13 : CePR? math/baker? Perception $knot Reality!

8-9-13 WAR (belated insert) Presently listening to Norman Goldman opening re: Rance Priebus and the Middle East. (5)mess+I-uh(b.s.), (7) format change, (13){Paper U?}, (21) NO!, (37) ! 

8-20-13 Back from Sekiu fishing trip, with dad, cousins, nephew and friends.
8-20-13 (a) [Aeschylus] & how buried

8-21-13 1 wiki(Miranda Warning), 2 (WSJ), 3 Trans Parent Seas, 4 Miranda Warning!, 5 The Guardian, 6 The Telegraph, 7 The Guardian(check redundancy)   Re: Oldsmobile (b.s.)

8-22-13:  That old hope and changey thing [!] (order of insert)  6 2 3 4 1 5 [7]
    (changey old hope and thing That [!]) Ribble this ? (FP2) 
8-23-13 bold added: not to Farce the Wor(l)d or parse SS oar well.
8-26-13: The (b.s.) of lemon ship is already inserted, with later untwist of mangled mixed meta for ... ?(FP2)
8-27-13 Not to pun on Too Bolds or W lines. (1 NOW, 2 The Cycle)
8-28-13 Hecuva post. (wMd?) Crtl F "spectrum" (a, b, g, i) See notes on original post and placement /timing of asterisks and links.  There is an M-bed within this FP.  But to cut the dimentionalism, there is more work. (d, w)

Smoking Gun to the Smoke and Mirrors

Addressing the "fishing expedition" in his March 20th, 2007"Press Conference":
BUSH QUOTE:

But that's Washington, D.C. for you. You know, there's a lot of politics in this town.

And I repeat, we would like people to hear the truth. And, Kelly, your question is one I'm confident will be asked of people up there. And the Justice Department will answer that question in open forum for everybody to see.

If the Democrats truly do want to move forward and find the right information, they ought to accept what I proposed. And the idea of dragging White House members up there to score political points, or to put the klieg lights out there -- which will harm the President's ability to get good information, Michael -- is -- I really do believe will show the true nature of this debate.

DOES THIS NOT INDICATE HE DOES NOT UNDERSTAND HIS OWN "REASONABLE PROPOSAL" ?
If there are not a lot of Dean screams going around the press corps, something is wrong. The big fish is at his pleasure with an empty pond apparently.

[Additional Comment: 9:30 PM]
White House Counsel's Proposal:

Questioning of White House officials would be conducted by a Member or limited number of Members, who would be accompanied by committee staff. Such interviews would be private and conducted without the need for an oath, transcript, subsequent testimony, or the subsequent issuance of subpoenas.

BACK TO THE TRANSCRIPT:

Q In San Diego, Nevada, Arizona, Republicans were the targets of investigations, and those U.S. attorneys were removed. Does that not give the appearance --
THE PRESIDENT: Well, I don't -- it may give the appearance of something, but I think what you need to do is listen to the facts, and let them explain to -- it's precisely why they're going up to testify, so that the American people can hear the truth about why the decision was made.

The bold and italics combo are mine, but it appears I have misunderestimated Bush in his brilliant navigation of his proposal.

Gone Fishing!

I have actually already returned[*].
A lot to catch up on.
Literally! NFRY[!]

[*]not exactly
[Dreams with my Father]

[8-16-11 See Comment One: Down Rigger and fishy comments. Parallel lines and reel bait.]

Schiller, Schelling, Shell Lacking and Schopenhauer*?

(1864-1917) Humanism, How is "exactness" possible*?
(1775-1854) Transcendental Idealism
Newtonian venn?**

* I will do little more than indicate Schopenhauer's relation to Hegel under Runes, let alone Schlick.(The Construction of Theories)
** Hobbes Squaring the Circle pre-Newton/Liebniz.

Ribble? re: nacre?
Hint?

12-27-13 Hobbes (b.s.)^  and Schlick(wiki) links inserted.

^ A(2) ? genre fishing ? ! ?

Pre-Mod L? (1588-1679)(1642-1727)(1646-1716)  So there was some overlap. Hobbes was mocked for trying to square the circle pre-calculus or pre-hyperbolic geometry. ? ! (lost roots ! ? [a, b, c ] ) (spoiler alert => OW do not scroll)

Network Coverage Etch-A-Sketch 3.0

I am not listening so you won't have to. 
But others R.**


Apologies (Or Apollo / Gees) for Scubby Ski-doo Math.
I may have lost track with Mitt, Ann, Ryan and the RNC-Con.
While we may have piqued, at reigning dogs and cats weak.*
"There he(I) goes again."

*Sharks week, Whether week***, Convention Weeks.(Peaks and Peeks)
** R, R  (Ammo Ann and Chris Christie)
*** not what I was fishing 4

10-29-12 In "F" able update.

Link to be found later...

or tangent.

Let alone course correction.

5-5-15
Speaking of trolling, I am fishing for a recent snag in my seine net or gill in my safety-net.  Somewhere in the area of foreign policy or economics, I recognized a contradiction in my lede-or-ship.  Bingo. 

(FP of sorts)
 [a thru i: order of link -- numerical order of insert.]
a 1, Five Things Ben Carson Doesn’t Get
b 2, A., B. C3-PO?, C., D., E., F. The Other Debates, G. Karl Rove vs. WA Hyperbole, H. Toll Keen, the Try-Logy?  , I. Toll Keen?
c 8, We R all Right?
d 9 Too Random... , (fp-11-13)
e 6
f  5
g 4
h 3
i 7 Divide to conquer?

[Elements to Hegel over ... ?]
[ MSNBC: AM inside joke Obama Letterman Dominoes! The Cycle. SB(t) Stochastic blowback or Honeypot? ]
[Seg way Hardball* Charlie/Bernie: Top 14 increased over bottom 130 million net.]

* 5-6-15 link attempt failed test
x, y, z
u, v, w?